1. I'll be teaching UHC 110 for the third time this fall.
2. I have a general topic, but not a theme. This time, we're looking at how Hamlet permeates our culture, both as a text and as a cultural icon, so we'll be looking both at Shakspeare's play in detail, but also at popular and contemporary reworkings of the play.
3. Hamlet, of course, as well as bits from other plays (Stoppard's "Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead" and "Dogg's Hamlet, as well as video clips from film versions and parodies (including The Simpsons, Frasier, Seinfeld, The Last Action Hero, etc.). What we're going to look at is how Hamlet the play and Hamlet/Shakespeare the cultural icons are interwoven and interpreted.
4. It's a strange class for me, kind of a hybrid between the academic classes I teach and the "how the university works and how you can be successful" practical material. For me, the mix doesn't work particularly well, and the first time I taught the course, I had a great difficulty figuring out how to blend the two in a useful way. I also overestimated the academic curiosity of the freshman honors students (or perhaps overestimated their interest in my field) the first time I taught it. The second time I taught it it worked much better? So my question is whether this theme can be relevant and interesting to the honors students, many of whom, by their own admission, are not that interested in theatre or literature.